ISSN 0253-2778

CN 34-1054/N

Open AccessOpen Access JUSTC Original Paper

Impact of the expansion of inter-bank certificates of deposit on the costs of corporate debt of financing of China

Cite this:
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2020.02.014
  • Received Date: 15 April 2018
  • Accepted Date: 10 July 2018
  • Rev Recd Date: 10 July 2018
  • Publish Date: 28 February 2020
  • Since the release at the end of 2013, the development of the domestic inter-bank certificates of deposit(CDs) market has been rapid, and inter-bank CDs has become the most important currency market tool. However, at present, there are still few systematic studies on inter-bank CDs and its impact on China’s financial markets, and there is a lack of quantitative research. At the same time, the majority of small and medium-sized enterprises in China now face the problems of financing difficulties and expensive financing. In this regard, it was studied that how inter-bank CDs effect the cost of corporate debt financing in China from both macro and micro perspectives.At the macro level, daily data of inter-bank CDs and various types of bonds in the bond market of China from August 2015 to July 2017 were used to study the process of expansion of inter-bank CDs and the mechanism of influence of it to bond market. At the micro level, quarterly unbalanced panel data of 865 non-ST and non-financial listed SMEs from October 2014 to September 2017 were used. The empirical results show that the expansion of inter-bank CDs can significantly increase the debt financing cost of small and medium-sized listed enterprises to a certain extent. After further verification by industry and scale, it was found that the results are not affected by the industry in which the enterprise is located, but will be significantly affected by the enterprise scale (using operating income as an indicator).
    Since the release at the end of 2013, the development of the domestic inter-bank certificates of deposit(CDs) market has been rapid, and inter-bank CDs has become the most important currency market tool. However, at present, there are still few systematic studies on inter-bank CDs and its impact on China’s financial markets, and there is a lack of quantitative research. At the same time, the majority of small and medium-sized enterprises in China now face the problems of financing difficulties and expensive financing. In this regard, it was studied that how inter-bank CDs effect the cost of corporate debt financing in China from both macro and micro perspectives.At the macro level, daily data of inter-bank CDs and various types of bonds in the bond market of China from August 2015 to July 2017 were used to study the process of expansion of inter-bank CDs and the mechanism of influence of it to bond market. At the micro level, quarterly unbalanced panel data of 865 non-ST and non-financial listed SMEs from October 2014 to September 2017 were used. The empirical results show that the expansion of inter-bank CDs can significantly increase the debt financing cost of small and medium-sized listed enterprises to a certain extent. After further verification by industry and scale, it was found that the results are not affected by the industry in which the enterprise is located, but will be significantly affected by the enterprise scale (using operating income as an indicator).
  • loading
  • [1]
    成婷.发行人视角下的同业存单高溢价之谜[J].债券,2017(3):54-59.
    [2]
    中信证券.同业存单监管收紧或缓解实体企业融资压力[N].上海证券报,2017-05-05.
    [3]
    薛勇.银行体系流动性对货币市场利率的影响:从总量到结构[J].债券,2016(6):30-36.
    [4]
    张鹏.以供给侧改革为契机降低企业融资成本[N].上海证券报,2017-09-15.
    [5]
    高连奎.2018中国经济存在“两忧一喜”[N].中国经济时报,2018-03-09.
    [6]
    冉学东.金融去杠杆大背景下同业存单受限大势所趋[N].华夏时报,2017-01-17.
    [7]
    娄飞鹏.金融领域高杠杆的深层次成因与去杠杆建议[J].西南金融,2017(6): 22-28.
    [8]
    熊启跃,张依茹.美国大额可转让存单市场的发展与启示[J].国际金融,2014,(3):72-77.
    [9]
    张永民.票据业务对上市商业银行绩效影响的实证研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2013.
    [10]
    伊冯.大银行一季度同业存单发行量创史上最大流动性隐忧浮现[N].凤凰国际imarkets,2018-04-03.
    [11]
    蒋琰.权益成本、债务成本与公司治理:影响差异性研究[J].管理世界,2009(11): 144-155.
    [12]
    李广子,刘力.债务融资成本与民营信贷歧视[J].金融研究,2009(12): 137-150.
    [13]
    王玉冬,武川,王琳璐.高新技术企业创新资金运营生态化及其水平测度[J].中国软科学,2017(7): 101-115.
    WANG Yudong,WU Chuan, WANG Linlu. Research on the ecological characteristics and achievement of high-tech enterprises’ innovation investment[J].China Soft Science, 2017(7): 101-115.
    [14]
    郑蓓.新三板企业债务融资成本研究[D].合肥:安徽大学,2016.
    [15]
    徐晓音.我国中小企业融资方式选择影响因素研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2010.
    [16]
    ARELLANOM, BOVER O. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1995, 68(1): 29-51.
    [17]
    BLUHM M, GEORG C, KRAHNEN J. Interbank intermediation[R]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Deutsche Bundesbank, 2016.
    [18]
    SUN LH. Systemic risk and interbank lending[J].Journal of Optimization Theory & Applications, 2016, 179: 400-424.
    [19]
    LANGFIELDS, LIU Z, OTA T, et al. Systemic illiquidity in the interbank network[R]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: European Systemic Risk Board, 2018.
    [20]
    CORRADO L, SCHULER T. Financial bubbles in interbank lending[R]. Munich, Germany: Ifo Institute-Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, 2018.
    [21]
    邱冠华,王剑,张宇. 解构同业存单套利链条,去杠杆之路任重道远[N].环球老虎财经,2017-03-20.
    [22]
    中信证券. [债市下跌的三大原因]美元和美债齐上涨,国内利率汇率压力大[N].债市日评,2016-11-15. )
  • 加载中

Catalog

    [1]
    成婷.发行人视角下的同业存单高溢价之谜[J].债券,2017(3):54-59.
    [2]
    中信证券.同业存单监管收紧或缓解实体企业融资压力[N].上海证券报,2017-05-05.
    [3]
    薛勇.银行体系流动性对货币市场利率的影响:从总量到结构[J].债券,2016(6):30-36.
    [4]
    张鹏.以供给侧改革为契机降低企业融资成本[N].上海证券报,2017-09-15.
    [5]
    高连奎.2018中国经济存在“两忧一喜”[N].中国经济时报,2018-03-09.
    [6]
    冉学东.金融去杠杆大背景下同业存单受限大势所趋[N].华夏时报,2017-01-17.
    [7]
    娄飞鹏.金融领域高杠杆的深层次成因与去杠杆建议[J].西南金融,2017(6): 22-28.
    [8]
    熊启跃,张依茹.美国大额可转让存单市场的发展与启示[J].国际金融,2014,(3):72-77.
    [9]
    张永民.票据业务对上市商业银行绩效影响的实证研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2013.
    [10]
    伊冯.大银行一季度同业存单发行量创史上最大流动性隐忧浮现[N].凤凰国际imarkets,2018-04-03.
    [11]
    蒋琰.权益成本、债务成本与公司治理:影响差异性研究[J].管理世界,2009(11): 144-155.
    [12]
    李广子,刘力.债务融资成本与民营信贷歧视[J].金融研究,2009(12): 137-150.
    [13]
    王玉冬,武川,王琳璐.高新技术企业创新资金运营生态化及其水平测度[J].中国软科学,2017(7): 101-115.
    WANG Yudong,WU Chuan, WANG Linlu. Research on the ecological characteristics and achievement of high-tech enterprises’ innovation investment[J].China Soft Science, 2017(7): 101-115.
    [14]
    郑蓓.新三板企业债务融资成本研究[D].合肥:安徽大学,2016.
    [15]
    徐晓音.我国中小企业融资方式选择影响因素研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2010.
    [16]
    ARELLANOM, BOVER O. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1995, 68(1): 29-51.
    [17]
    BLUHM M, GEORG C, KRAHNEN J. Interbank intermediation[R]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Deutsche Bundesbank, 2016.
    [18]
    SUN LH. Systemic risk and interbank lending[J].Journal of Optimization Theory & Applications, 2016, 179: 400-424.
    [19]
    LANGFIELDS, LIU Z, OTA T, et al. Systemic illiquidity in the interbank network[R]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: European Systemic Risk Board, 2018.
    [20]
    CORRADO L, SCHULER T. Financial bubbles in interbank lending[R]. Munich, Germany: Ifo Institute-Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, 2018.
    [21]
    邱冠华,王剑,张宇. 解构同业存单套利链条,去杠杆之路任重道远[N].环球老虎财经,2017-03-20.
    [22]
    中信证券. [债市下跌的三大原因]美元和美债齐上涨,国内利率汇率压力大[N].债市日评,2016-11-15. )

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return