Harnack inequality for polyharmonic equations

Jiamin Zeng; Runjie Zheng; Yi Fang

doi:10.52396/JUSTC-2022-0114

JUSTC > 2023 > 53(5): 0504. > DOI: 10.52396/JUSTC-2022-0114 CSTR: 32290.14.JUSTC-2022-0114

PDF (469 KB)

Open Access JUSTC Mathematics Article 13 June 2023

Harnack inequality for polyharmonic equations

Department of Mathematics, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan 243002, China

Cite this: JUSTC, 2023, 53(5): 0504

https://doi.org/10.52396/JUSTC-2022-0114

CSTR: 32290.14.JUSTC-2022-0114

More Information

Author Bio:
Jiamin Zeng is currently a postgraduate student at Anhui University of Technology. His research mainly focuses on elliptic partial differential equations

Yi Fang is an Associate Professor at Anhui University of Technology. He received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Science and Technology of China in 2015. His research mainly focuses on elliptic partial differential equations
Corresponding author:
Yi Fang, E-mail: yif1915@ahut.edu.cn
Received Date: August 07, 2022
Accepted Date: November 16, 2022
Available Online: June 13, 2023

Full text PDF

Abstract

Abstract

Some new types of mean value formulas for the polyharmonic functions were established. Based on the formulas, the Harnack inequality for the nonnegative solutions to the polyharmonic equations was proved.

Graphical Abstract

Harnack inequality.

Abstract

Some new types of mean value formulas for the polyharmonic functions were established. Based on the formulas, the Harnack inequality for the nonnegative solutions to the polyharmonic equations was proved.
Public Summary
- Some new type mean value formulas for polyharmonic functions were established.
- The Harnack inequality for polyharmonic functions was proved.

FullText(HTML)

1. Introduction

The Harnack estimates for the harmonic equation have been investigated profoundly^{[1, 2]}. Let $\varOmega\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ $(n\geqslant2)$ be a connected domain. In 2006, Caristi and Mitidieri^[3] considered the Harnack inequality for nonnegative solutions to the biharmonic equation

$\tag{1}(-\Delta)^2 u(x) = 0, \ \ \text{in} \ \varOmega.$

(1)

They used the mean value formulas for the biharmonic functions, which are the solutions to the biharmonic equations and the maximum principle, to prove the Harnack inequality. Motivated by the approaches and results in their work, we will consider the Harnack inequality for the nonnegative weak solutions to the $k$ -harmonic ( $k\geqslant 3$ ) equation

$\tag{2}(-\Delta)^ku(x) = 0, \ \ \text{in} \ \varOmega.$

(2)

The function $u$ that satisfies Eq. (2) is called $k$ -harmonic or polyharmonic. We shall focus on the case $k = 3$ and prove the mean value formulas for the 3-harmonic function and for the general $k$ -harmonic function cases by induction argument. Then, we will give the proof of the Harnack inequality for Eq. (2).

Theorem 1.1. Assume that $u$ is a nonnegative weak solution of Eq. (2) such that $-\Delta u\geqslant0$ in $\varOmega$ . Then there exists $C = C(n)>0$ , such that for any $x\in\varOmega$ and each $R$ satisfying $0 < 2R < {\rm dist}(x,\partial \varOmega)$ and $B_{2R}(x)\subset\subset\varOmega$ , it holds that

$\tag{3}\sup\limits_{B_{R/2}(x)}u\leqslant C\inf\limits_{B_{R/2}(x)}u.$

(3)

Remark 1.1. The assumption $-\Delta u\geqslant0$ in $\varOmega$ is necessary. Since if we let $u(x) = x_1^2$ for $x = (x_1, \cdots, x_n)\in \mathbb{R}^n$ , then $(-\Delta)^ku(x) = 0$ for $k\geqslant3$ , $-\Delta u(x) = -2 < 0$ . However, for any $R>0$ , $u$ does not satisfy the Harnack inequality in $B_R(0)$ .

The remaining part of this paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, we figure out the mean value formulas for polyharmonic functions, and in Section 3, we give the proof of Theorem 1.1.

2. The mean value formulas

In this section, we first prove the mean value formulas for 3-harmonic functions, and then extend the mean value formulas to the general polyharmonic function cases by the induction argument. The mean value formulas we consider here are different from those in Refs. [4, 5] and references therein.

Definition 2.1. For any $x\in\mathbb{R}^n$ , $r>0$ , the spherical average of $u$ is defined as

$\bar u(x,r) = \frac{1}{|\partial B_r(x)|} \int_{\partial B_r(x)} u(y)\ {\rm d}\sigma_y.$

Remark 2.1. When there is no ambiguity, we will simply write $\bar{u}(r)$ instead of $\bar{u}(x,r)$ . Obviously, we have

$\bar u(r) = \frac{1}{\omega_n} \int_{\partial B_1(0)} u(x+r\xi)\ {\rm d}\sigma_\xi,$

where $\omega_n$ is the measure of the unit sphere $\partial B_1(0)$ .

The following lemma was very useful in the study of higher-order conformally invariant elliptic equations^[6]. For the convenience of the readers, we will give a proof.

Lemma 2.1. For any integer $k\geqslant1$ , it holds that $\Delta^k\bar u(r) = \overline{\Delta^k u}(r).$

Proof. Since $\bar u(r)$ is radially symmetric, it follows that

$\Delta\bar{u}(r) = \bar{u}''(r)+\frac{n-1}{r}\bar{u}'(r) = \frac{1}{r^{n-1}}(r^{n-1}\bar{u}'(r))'.$

Notice that

$\bar{u}'(r) = \frac{1}{\omega_n}\int_{\partial B_1(0)}\nabla u(x+r\xi)\cdot\xi {\rm d}\sigma_\xi,$

where $\xi$ is the outward unit normal vector to the boundary $\partial B_1(0)$ . Then the divergence theorem^[2] implies that

$r^{n-1}\bar{u}'(r) = \frac{1}{\omega_n}\int_{\partial B_r(x)}\nabla u(y)\cdot\xi {\rm d}\sigma_y = \frac{1}{\omega_n}\int_{B_r(x)}\Delta u(y) {\rm d}y.$

Since

$\begin{split} & \frac{\partial}{\partial r}\int_{B_r(x)}\Delta u(y) {\rm d}y = \lim\limits_{t\rightarrow r}\frac{\int_{B_t(x)}\Delta u(y) {\rm d}y-\int_{B_r(x)}\Delta u(y) {\rm d}y}{t-r}=\\& \lim\limits_{t\rightarrow r}\frac{\int_0^t\int_{\partial B_s(x)}\Delta u(y) {\rm d}\sigma_y{\rm d}s-\int_0^r\int_{\partial B_s(x)}\Delta u(y) {\rm d}\sigma_y{\rm d}s}{t-r}=\\& \int_{\partial B_r(x)}\Delta u(y) {\rm d}\sigma_y, \end{split}$

then

$\Delta\bar{u}(r) = \frac{1}{r^{n-1}}(r^{n-1}\bar{u}'(r))' = \frac{1}{|\partial B_r(x)|}\int_{\partial B_r(x)}\Delta u(y) {\rm d}\sigma_y = \overline{\Delta u}(r).$

Therefore, for any integer $k\geq1$ , it can be easily concluded that $\Delta^k \bar u(r) = \overline{\Delta^k u}(r)$ by induction.

Now, we give the proof of the mean value formula for 3-harmonic functions by the approach in Ref. [7].

Lemma 2.2. Assume that $u$ is a weak solution to $(-\Delta)^3u = 0$ in $\varOmega$ . For any $x\in\varOmega$ , denoted by $d_x = {\rm dist} (x,\partial\varOmega)$ , then for any $0<R<d_x$ , the following mean value formula holds

$\begin{split} &u(x) = \frac{(n+1)(n+2)}{16}\frac{1}{|B_R(x)|} \int_{B_R(x)} u(y) \cdot \\& \bigg[(n+2)(n+4)-2(n+3)(n+5)\frac{|y-x|}{R}+(n+4)(n+6)\frac{|y-x|^2}{R^2}\bigg] {\rm d}y. \end{split}$

Proof. By Weyl’s lemma^[7], we can prove that $u\in C^\infty(\varOmega)$ . For any fixed point $x\in\varOmega$ , we denote by

$\bar u(r) = \frac{1}{\omega_n} \int_{\partial B_1(0)} u(x+r\xi)\ {\rm d}\sigma_{\xi}$

and

$\overline{\Delta^2 u}(r) = \frac{1}{\omega_n} \int_{\partial B_1(0)} \Delta^2 u(x+r\xi)\ {\rm d}\sigma_{\xi}.$

Since $\bar{u}(r)$ is radially symmetric, then by Lemma 2.1, for $0<r<d_x$ , we have

$\tag{4}\begin{split} \Delta^2\bar{u}(r) = & \bar u^{(4)}(r)+\frac{2(n-1)}{r}\bar u'''(r)+\frac{n^2-4n+3}{r^2}\bar u''(r)-\\&\frac{n^2-4n+3}{r^3}\bar u'(r) = \overline{\Delta^2u}(r). \end{split}$

(4)

Note that $(-\Delta)^3u = 0$ , so $\Delta^2u$ is harmonic. By the mean value formula, we have $\Delta^2u(x) = \overline{\Delta^2u}(r)$ for any $0<r<d_x$ . Then, it is easy to check that $\dfrac{r^4}{8n(n+2)}\Delta^2u(x)$ is a special solution to Eq. (4). Therefore, the general solutions to Eq. (4) can be given by

$\begin{equation*} \bar u(r) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} c_{11}+c_{12}r^{4-n}+c_{13}r^{2-n}+c_{14}r^2+\dfrac{r^4}{8n(n+2)}\Delta^2u(x), &n\geqslant5; \\ c_{21}+c_{22}r^{-2}+c_{23}\ln r+c_{24}r^2+\dfrac{r^4}{192}\Delta^2u(x), &n = 4; \\ c_{31}+c_{32}r^{-1}+c_{33}r+c_{34}r^2+\dfrac{r^4}{120}\Delta^2u(x), &n = 3; \\ c_{41}+c_{42}\ln r+c_{43}r^2\ln r+c_{44}r^2+\dfrac{r^4}{64}\Delta^2u(x), &n = 2; \\ \end{array} \right. \end{equation*}$

where $c_{ij}$ ( $i,j = 1,\cdots,4$ ) are all constant. Next, we calculate these constants.

Consider the case $n\geqslant5$ first. Since $\bar u$ is continuous in $[0,d_x]$ and $\bar u(0) = u(x) = c_{11}$ , which implies that $c_{12} = c_{13} = 0$ ,

$\tag{5}u(x)+c_{14}r^2+\frac{r^4}{8n(n+2)}\Delta^2u(x) = \bar{u}(r).$

(5)

Then, taking the Laplacian operator $\Delta = \partial^2_{rr}+\dfrac{n-1}{r}\partial_r$ on both sides of Eq. (5), we obtain

$\begin{equation*} 2c_{14}+\frac{3r^2}{2n(n+2)}\Delta^2u(x)+\frac{n-1}{r}\left(2c_{14}r+\frac{r^3}{2n(n+2)}\Delta^2u(x)\right) = \Delta\bar{u}(r), \end{equation*}$

which yields

$\begin{equation*} 2nc_{14}+\frac{r^2}{2n}\Delta^2u(x) = \Delta\bar{u}(r). \end{equation*}$

Since $\Delta\bar{u}(r) = \overline{\Delta u}(r)$ by Lemma 2.1, letting $r\to0$ , we get $c_{14} = \dfrac{1}{2n}\Delta u(x)$ .

For the cases $n = 2,3,4$ , we can use the same strategy as the cases $n\geqslant5$ . Therefore, for $n\geqslant2$ , we have the following uniform formula

$\tag{6}u(x)+\frac{r^2}{2n}\Delta u(x)+\frac{r^4}{8n(n+2)}\Delta^2u(x) = \bar{u}(r).$

(6)

For any $R\in [0,d_x]$ , multiplying $\omega_nr^{n-1}$ on both sides of Eq. (6) and integrating with respect to $r\in[0,R]$ , we get

$\tag{7}\begin{split} &u(x)+\frac{R^2}{2(n+2)}\Delta u(x)+\frac{R^4}{8(n+2)(n+4)}\Delta^2u(x) =\\& \frac{1}{|B_R(0)|} \int_{B_R(0)} u(x+y){\rm d}y. \end{split}$

(7)

Fixing $R = r$ in Eq. (7) and combining it with Eq. (6), we obtain

$\tag{8}\begin{split} &u(x)- \frac{r^4}{8(n+2)(n+4)}\Delta^2u(x)=\\& \frac{n+2}{2}\frac{1}{|B_r(0)|} \int_{B_r(0)} u(x+y){\rm d}y -\frac{n}{2\omega_n} \int_{\partial B_1(0)} u(x+r\xi){\rm d}\sigma_{\xi}. \end{split}$

(8)

Again, for any $R\in [0,d_x]$ , multiplying $r^{n+k}$ ( $k\geqslant0$ ) on both sides of Eq. (8) and integrating with respect to $r\in[0,\,R]$ , we obtain

$\begin{split} &\frac{R^{n+k+1}}{n+k+1}u(x)-\frac{R^{n+k+5}}{8(n+2)(n+4)(n+k+5)}\Delta^2u(x) =\\& \frac{n(n+2)}{2\omega_n} \int_0^R r^k \int_{B_r(0)} u(x+y){\rm d}y{\rm d}r - \\& \frac{n}{2\omega_n} \int_0^R r^{n+k} \int_{\partial B_1(0)} u(x+r\xi){\rm d}\sigma_{\xi}{\rm d}r = \\& \frac{n(n+2)}{2\omega_n} \int_0^R r^k \int_0^r \rho^{n-1}\int_{\partial B_1(0)} u(x+\rho\xi) {\rm d}\sigma_{\xi}{\rm d}\rho {\rm d}r -\frac{n}{2} \int_0^R r^{n+k}\bar u(r) {\rm d}r = \\& \frac{n(n+2)}{2} \int_0^R r^k \int_0^r \rho^{n-1}\bar u(\rho) {\rm d}\rho {\rm d}r - \frac{n}{2} \int_0^R r^{n+k}\bar u(r) {\rm d}r . \end{split}$

Let $f(r): = \int_0^r \rho^{n-1}\bar u(\rho){\rm }{\rm d}\rho$ , then integration by parts implies that

$\begin{split}{l} &\int_0^R r^k \int_0^r \rho^{n-1}\bar u(\rho) {\rm d}\rho {\rm d}r = \frac{R^{k+1}}{k+1}f(R)-\int_0^R \frac{r^{k+1}}{k+1}f'(r) {\rm d}r =\\& \frac{R^{k+1}}{k+1} \int_0^R r^{n-1}\bar u(r) {\rm d}r -\int_0^R \frac{r^{n+k}}{k+1} \bar u(r) {\rm d}r. \end{split}$

It follows that

$\begin{split} &\frac{R^{n+k+1}}{n+k+1}u(x)-\frac{R^{n+k+5}}{8(n+2)(n+4)(n+k+5)}\Delta^2u(x)=\\& \frac{n(n+2)}{2(k+1)}R^{k+1}\int_0^R r^{n-1}\bar u(r) {\rm d}r -\frac{n(n+k+3)}{2(k+1)}\int_0^R r^{n+k}\bar u(r) {\rm d}r. \end{split}$

Therefore,

$\tag{9}\begin{split} &u(x)-\frac{(n+k+1)R^4}{8(n+2)(n+4)(n+k+5)}\Delta^2u(x) =\\& \frac{n+k+1}{2(k+1)}\frac{1}{|B_R(x)|}\int_{B_R(x)} u(y)\left[(n+2)-(n+k+3)\frac{|y-x|^{k+1}}{R^{k+1}} \right]{\rm d}y. \end{split}$

(9)

Plugging $k = 0$ and $k = 1$ into Eq. (9), we have two special equalities as follows:

$\begin{split} &u(x)-\frac{(n+1)R^4}{8(n+2)(n+4)(n+5)}\Delta^2u(x)=\\& \frac{n+1}{2}\frac{1}{|B_R(x)|}\int_{B_R(x)} u(y)\left[(n+2)-(n+3)\frac{|y-x|}{R} \right]{\rm d}y \end{split}$

and

$\begin{split} &u(x)-\frac{R^4}{8(n+4)(n+6)}\Delta^2u(x) =\\& \frac{n+2}{4}\frac{1}{|B_R(x)|}\int_{B_R(x)} u(y)\left[(n+2)-(n+4)\frac{|y-x|^2}{R^2} \right]{\rm d}y, \end{split}$

which implies that

$\begin{split} &u(x) = \frac{(n+1)(n+2)}{16}\frac{1}{|B_R(x)|} \int_{B_R(x)} u(y) \cdot \\&\bigg[ (n+2)(n+4)-2(n+3)(n+5)\frac{|y-x|}{R}+(n+4)(n+6)\frac{|y-x|^2}{R^2}\bigg]{\rm d}y. \end{split}$

By the similar arguments, generally, we can obtain the mean value formulas for $k$ -harmonic functions.

Lemma 2.3. Assume that $u$ is a weak solution to $(-\Delta)^ku = 0$ in $\varOmega$ , $k\geqslant3$ . For any $x\in\varOmega$ , denoted by $d_x = {\rm dist}(x,\partial\varOmega)$ , then for any $0<R<d_x$ , the following mean value equality holds

$u(x) = a(n,k)\frac{1}{|B_R(x)|} \int_{B_R(x)}u(y)\mathop \sum \limits_{i = 0}^{k - 1} b_i(k)\frac{|y-x|^i}{R^i}{\rm d}y,$

where $a(n,k) = \dfrac{\prod^{k-1}_{m = 1}(n+m)}{2^{k-1}\left[(k-1)!\right]^2}$ and $b_i(k) = (-1)^iC^i_{k-1} \cdot \prod^{k-1}_{m = 1} (n+2m+i)$ , $i = 0,\cdots,k-1$ .

Proof. If we denote by

$f(R,x) = a(n,k)\frac{1}{|B_R(x)|} \int_{B_R(x)}u(y)\mathop \sum \limits_{i = 0}^{k - 1} b_i(k)\frac{|y-x|^i}{R^i}{\rm d}y,$

where $a(n,k) = \dfrac{\prod^{k-1}_{m = 1}(n+m)}{2^{k-1}\left[(k-1)!\right]^2}$ and $b_i(k) = (-1)^iC^i_{k-1} \cdot \prod^{k-1}_{m = 1}(n+2m+i)$ , $i = 0,\cdots,k-1$ . Then by direct calculation, we get

$\frac{\partial}{\partial R}f(R,x) = 0$

and

$\lim_{R\to0}f(R,x) = u(x),$

which finishes the proof.

3. Proof of Theorem 1.1

Now, we can give the proof of Theorem 1.1.

Proof. On the one hand, for any $x\in\varOmega$ , $0<2R< {\rm dist}(x,\partial\varOmega)$ , by Lemma 2.3 we have

$u(x)\leqslant C(n,k)\frac{1}{|B_R(x)|} \int_{B_R(x)} u(y) {\rm d}y.$

If $z\in B_{R/2}(x)$ , we have $B_{R/2}(z)\subset B_R(x)$ and

$\begin{split} u(z) \leqslant & C(n,k)\frac{1}{|B_{R/2}(z)|} \int_{B_{R/2}(z)} u(y) {\rm d}y \leqslant\\& C(n,k)\frac{2^n}{|B_{R}(x)|} \int_{B_{R}(x)} u(y)\ {\rm d}y. \end{split}$

Therefore,

$\tag{10}\sup\limits_{B_{R/2}(x)} u\leqslant\frac{C(n,k)}{|B_R(x)|} \int_{B_R(x)} u(y){\rm d}y.$

(10)

The value of the above positive constants $C(n,k)$ may vary in different places.

On the other hand, since $u\geqslant0$ and $-\Delta u\geqslant0$ in $\varOmega$ , by the mean value inequality, for any $x\in\varOmega$ , $t>0$ , if $B_t(x)\subset\subset \varOmega$ , then

$u(x)\geqslant\frac{1}{|B_t(x)|}\int_{B_t(x)}u(y) {\rm d}y.$

By Hopf’s lemma^{[1, 2]}, we have $\inf\limits_{B_{R/2}(x)}u = \inf\limits_{\partial B_{R/2}(x)}u$ . Without loss of generality, we assume the minimum point $x_0\in\partial B_{R/2}(x)$ , then $u(x)\geqslant u(x_0)$ . Obviously, $B_{R/2}(x)\subset B_R(x)\subset B_{3R/2}(x_0)\subset\subset\varOmega$ , so we have

$\tag{11}\begin{split} &\inf\limits_{B_{R/2}(x)}u = u(x_0)\geqslant \\& \dfrac{1}{|B_{3R/2}(x_0)|}\int_{B_{3R/2}(x_0)}u(y) {\rm d}y \geqslant \\&\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)^n\dfrac{1}{|B_R(x)|}\int_{B_R(x)}u(y)\ {\rm d}y. \end{split}$

(11)

By (10) and (11), the proof is completed.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr. Bo Xia at the University of Science and Technology of China for useful discussions and comments on this work. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11801006, 12071489).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Some new type mean value formulas for polyharmonic functions were established. The Harnack inequality for polyharmonic functions was proved.

References (7)

References

[1]	Han Q, Lin F. Elliptic Partial Differential Equations. 2nd edition. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2011.
[2]	Gilbarg D, Trudinger N. Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1983.
[3]	Caristi G, Mitidieri E. Harnack inequality and applications to solutions of biharmonic equations. In: Partial Differential Equations and Functional Analysis. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser Verlag, 2006.
[4]	Karachik V V. On the mean value property for polyharmonic functions in the ball. Siberian Advances in Mathematics, 2014, 24 (3): 169–182. DOI: 10.3103/S1055134414030031
[5]	Łysik G. On the mean value property for polyharmonic functions. Acta Math. Hung., 2011, 133: 133–139. DOI: 10.1007/s10474-011-0138-7
[6]	Wei J, Xu X. Classification of solutions of higher order conformally invariant equations. Math. Ann., 1999, 313: 207–228. DOI: 10.1007/s002080050258
[7]	Simader C G. Mean value formulas, Weyl’s lemma and Liouville theorems for δ² and Stokes’ system. Results in Mathematics, 1992, 22: 761–780. DOI: 10.1007/BF03323122

Supplements (1)

Supplements
Other Related Supplements
- Graphic and text summary
  Download

Cited By

Track Citations

Get Citation

{{if article.articleBusiness.pdfLink && article.articleBusiness.pdfLink != ''}} {{else}} {{/if}}PDF

XML

References

[1]	Han Q, Lin F. Elliptic Partial Differential Equations. 2nd edition. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2011.
[2]	Gilbarg D, Trudinger N. Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1983.
[3]	Caristi G, Mitidieri E. Harnack inequality and applications to solutions of biharmonic equations. In: Partial Differential Equations and Functional Analysis. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser Verlag, 2006.
[4]	Karachik V V. On the mean value property for polyharmonic functions in the ball. Siberian Advances in Mathematics, 2014, 24 (3): 169–182. DOI: 10.3103/S1055134414030031
[5]	Łysik G. On the mean value property for polyharmonic functions. Acta Math. Hung., 2011, 133: 133–139. DOI: 10.1007/s10474-011-0138-7
[6]	Wei J, Xu X. Classification of solutions of higher order conformally invariant equations. Math. Ann., 1999, 313: 207–228. DOI: 10.1007/s002080050258
[7]	Simader C G. Mean value formulas, Weyl’s lemma and Liouville theorems for δ² and Stokes’ system. Results in Mathematics, 1992, 22: 761–780. DOI: 10.1007/BF03323122

[1]	XUE Yimin, CHEN Shouting. Multiplicity of solutions to elliptic equations with exponential nonlinearities[J]. JUSTC, 2020, 50(3): 300-311. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2020.03.007
[2]	WANG Shicheng, HOU Xinmin. The Erdo″s-So′s conjecture for 2-center spiders[J]. JUSTC, 2020, 50(3): 289-293. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2020.03.005
[3]	LIAO Qunying. The computing formula for generalized Euler functions[J]. JUSTC, 2019, 49(8): 614-619. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2019.08.003
[4]	SHAO Xingming, ZHENG Chichao, ZHAO Wei, PENG Hu. Study on the feature velocity in ultrasonic guided wave of long bone based on the S transforms[J]. JUSTC, 2017, 47(7): 594-601. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2017.07.007
[5]	PAN Chen, ZHANG Shuguang. Portfolio with consumption and terminal gains under loss aversion[J]. JUSTC, 2016, 46(11): 912-918. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2016.11.006
[6]	MAO Yuemei, MA Xiaojian, YANG Nanying. On S-c-propermutable subgroups of finite groups[J]. JUSTC, 2015, 45(12): 976-982. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2015.12.003
[7]	FANG Yi. A new proof of the classification of solutions to some linearized fractional Yamabe type equations[J]. JUSTC, 2015, 45(12): 967-971. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2015.12.001
[8]	XING Jie. Gradient estimates for f-exponentially harmonic functions on complete Riemannian manifolds[J]. JUSTC, 2015, 45(9): 717-720. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2015.09.002
[9]	YU Xiaolong, HUANG Jianhong. On partially s-permutable subgroups of finite groups[J]. JUSTC, 2014, 44(12): 975-981. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2014.12.002
[10]	YU Wei, WANG Kunpeng, LI Bao. Constructing hash function from plaintext to Huff curves[J]. JUSTC, 2014, 44(10): 835-838. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2014.10.006

TrendMD

Volume 53 Issue 5 PP. 0504

Cover

Keywords

Article Metrics

Article views (361) PDF downloads (1351) Cited by(1)>>

Cited by

Periodical cited type(1)

1.	Du, Z., Feng, Z., Li, Y. Classification of Solutions to Several Semi-linear Polyharmonic Equations and Fractional Equations. Journal of Geometric Analysis, 2024, 34(3): 87. DOI:10.1007/s12220-023-01543-z

Harnack inequality for polyharmonic equations

Abstract

Graphical Abstract

Abstract