Abstract
The common areas and methodologies, including current tendencies and trends, as well as individual national characteristics, were analyzed, based on the Antarctic scientific research strategies of sovereign states such as the USA, Britain, Australia and New Zealand. This critique also examined the role that the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research plays in international research cooperation and emphasized the importance of understanding Antarctic research strategy.
Abstract
The common areas and methodologies, including current tendencies and trends, as well as individual national characteristics, were analyzed, based on the Antarctic scientific research strategies of sovereign states such as the USA, Britain, Australia and New Zealand. This critique also examined the role that the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research plays in international research cooperation and emphasized the importance of understanding Antarctic research strategy.