[1] |
Diebold F X, Yilmaz K. Measuring financial asset return and volatility spillovers, with application to global equity markets. The Economic Journal, 2009, 119(1): 158–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02208.x
|
[2] |
Diebold F X, Yilmaz K. Better to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers. International Journal of Forecasting, 2012, 28(1): 57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006
|
[3] |
Diebold F X, Yilmaz K. On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms. Journal of Econometrics, 2014, 182(1): 119–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.04.012
|
[4] |
Akhtaruzzaman M, Boubaker S, Sensoy A. Financial contagion during COVID-19 crisis. Finance Research Letters, 2021, 38: 101604. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101604
|
[5] |
Corbet S, Meegan A, Larkin C, et al. Exploring the dynamic relationships between cryptocurrencies and other financial assets. Economics Letters, 2018, 165: 28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.01.004
|
[6] |
Antonakakis N, Chatziantoniou I, Gabauer D. Refined measures of dynamic connectedness based on time-varying parameter vector autoregression. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 2020, 13(4): 84. doi: 10.3390/jrfm13040084
|
[7] |
Cortina J, Didier T, Schmukler S. Global corporate debt during crises: Implications of switching borrowing across markets. Journal of International Economics, 2021, 131: 103487. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2021.103487
|
[8] |
Luo S, Qiao G, Wang Q. Research on dynamic linkage effect of convertible bonds and stock market. Price: Theory and Practice, 2020 (5): 82–85,175. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19851/j.cnki.CN11-1010/F.2020.05.160
|
[9] |
Meng H, Zhang L, Cheng Y. Study on the risk spillover effects of China’s financial market. Statistics & Information Forum, 2021, 36 (11): 63–75. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3116.2021.11.006
|
[10] |
Fei Z, Liu K. Volatility spillover effects and risk pricing of government bond markets under the condition of financial opening. Economic Research Journal, 2020, 55(9): 25–41. (in Chinese)
|
[11] |
Zhao W, Meng X, Xiang X. Research on the mechanism and measurement of systemic risk formation in Chinese bond market. Journal of Financial Development Research, 2022 (10): 82–87. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19647/j.cnki.37-1462/f.2022.10.011
|
[12] |
Wu H, Han Y, Zheng Z. An experimental construction of the monitoring system of bond market fragility in China. Financial Regulation Research, 2018 (6): 31–47. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13490/j.cnki.frr.2018.06.003
|
[13] |
Zhang A, Pan M, Liu B, et al. Systemic risk: The coordination of macroprudential and monetary policies in China. Economic Modelling, 2020, 93: 415–429. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.08.017
|
[14] |
Huang Y, Cho Y, Tao K, et al. The support of monetary policy and macroprudential on macroeconomic stability. Journal of Financial Research, 2019, 474 (12): 70–91. (in Chinese)
|
[15] |
Chen Y, Chen H, Li G, et al. Time-varying effect of macro-prudential policies on household credit growth: Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 2021, 72: 241–254. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2021.08.010
|
[16] |
Chari A, Stedman K D, Forbes K. Spillovers at the extremes: The macroprudential stance and vulnerability to the global financial cycle. Journal of International Economics, 2022, 136: 103582. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2022.103582
|
[17] |
Wang L, Li B, Ma X, et al. The price volatility spillover effect and its sustainability between Chinese crude oil future and international crude oil futures: Based on the BEKK-MGARCH model. Systems Engineering, 2021, 39(3): 102–120. (in Chinese)
|
[18] |
Zhou A, Han F. Research on the risk spillovers between stock and exchange rate markets—Based on the GARCH-TVP Copula-CoVaR model. Studies of International Finance, 2017 (11): 54–64. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16475/j.cnki.1006-1029.2017.11.006
|
[19] |
Bekiros S D, Paccagnini A. Macroprudential policy and forecasting using hybrid DSGE Models with financial frictions and state space Markov-switching TVP-VARs. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2014, 19 (7): 1565–1592. doi: 10.1017/S1365100513000953
|
[20] |
Alizadeh S, Brandt M W, Diebold F X. Range-based estimation of stochastic volatility models. Journal of Finance, 2002, 57(3): 1047–1091. doi: 10.1111/1540-6261.00454
|
[21] |
Livingston M, Poon W, Zhou L. Are Chinese credit ratings relevant? A study of the Chinese bond market and credit rating industry. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2018, 87 : 216–232. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.09.020
|
[22] |
Chesney M, Reshetar G, Karaman M. The impact of terrorism on financial markets: An empirical study. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2011, 35(2): 253–267. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.07.026
|
[23] |
Jiang X, Zhao Y. Research on the risks and opportunities faced by Chinese enterprises in issuing US dollar bonds. Economic Review Journal, 2017 (7): 112–117. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16528/j.cnki.22-1054/f.201707112
|
[24] |
Ferreira M A, Miguel A F. The determinants of domestic and foreign bond bias. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 2011, 21(5): 279–300. doi: 10.1016/j.mulfin.2011.07.004
|
[25] |
Zhou X, Li M, Liu T. Co-movements between onshore and offshore RMB bond markets. Studies of International Finance, 2015 (3): 44–53. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16475/j.cnki.1006-1029.2015.03.005
|
Figure 1. Total spillover and directional spillover. The total spillover effect equals 1– (Σ the spillover effect from A to A), where A represents any bond market. The spillover effect from others to CH means that the Chinese RMB bond market received spillover effects from other bond markets. The spillover effect from CH to others means that the Chinese RMB bond market imposes a spillover effect on other bond markets. The spillover effect of CHUSD is the same as that of CH.
Figure 2. Net pairwise spillover. Note: Taking the first picture as an example, a positive net paired spillover effect means that the spillover effect from the Chinese USD Bond Index to the FTSE Russel US Bond Index is greater than the spillover effect from the FTSE Russel US Bond Index to the Chinese USD Bond Index.
Figure 4. Net pairwise volatility spillover. Taking the first figure as an example, a positive net pairwise spillover effect means that the spillover effect from Chinese RMB Bond Index volatility to US Bond Index volatility is greater than the spillover effect from US Bond Index volatility to Chinese RMB Bond Index volatility; net pairwise spillovers.
[1] |
Diebold F X, Yilmaz K. Measuring financial asset return and volatility spillovers, with application to global equity markets. The Economic Journal, 2009, 119(1): 158–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02208.x
|
[2] |
Diebold F X, Yilmaz K. Better to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers. International Journal of Forecasting, 2012, 28(1): 57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006
|
[3] |
Diebold F X, Yilmaz K. On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms. Journal of Econometrics, 2014, 182(1): 119–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.04.012
|
[4] |
Akhtaruzzaman M, Boubaker S, Sensoy A. Financial contagion during COVID-19 crisis. Finance Research Letters, 2021, 38: 101604. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101604
|
[5] |
Corbet S, Meegan A, Larkin C, et al. Exploring the dynamic relationships between cryptocurrencies and other financial assets. Economics Letters, 2018, 165: 28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.01.004
|
[6] |
Antonakakis N, Chatziantoniou I, Gabauer D. Refined measures of dynamic connectedness based on time-varying parameter vector autoregression. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 2020, 13(4): 84. doi: 10.3390/jrfm13040084
|
[7] |
Cortina J, Didier T, Schmukler S. Global corporate debt during crises: Implications of switching borrowing across markets. Journal of International Economics, 2021, 131: 103487. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2021.103487
|
[8] |
Luo S, Qiao G, Wang Q. Research on dynamic linkage effect of convertible bonds and stock market. Price: Theory and Practice, 2020 (5): 82–85,175. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19851/j.cnki.CN11-1010/F.2020.05.160
|
[9] |
Meng H, Zhang L, Cheng Y. Study on the risk spillover effects of China’s financial market. Statistics & Information Forum, 2021, 36 (11): 63–75. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3116.2021.11.006
|
[10] |
Fei Z, Liu K. Volatility spillover effects and risk pricing of government bond markets under the condition of financial opening. Economic Research Journal, 2020, 55(9): 25–41. (in Chinese)
|
[11] |
Zhao W, Meng X, Xiang X. Research on the mechanism and measurement of systemic risk formation in Chinese bond market. Journal of Financial Development Research, 2022 (10): 82–87. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19647/j.cnki.37-1462/f.2022.10.011
|
[12] |
Wu H, Han Y, Zheng Z. An experimental construction of the monitoring system of bond market fragility in China. Financial Regulation Research, 2018 (6): 31–47. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13490/j.cnki.frr.2018.06.003
|
[13] |
Zhang A, Pan M, Liu B, et al. Systemic risk: The coordination of macroprudential and monetary policies in China. Economic Modelling, 2020, 93: 415–429. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.08.017
|
[14] |
Huang Y, Cho Y, Tao K, et al. The support of monetary policy and macroprudential on macroeconomic stability. Journal of Financial Research, 2019, 474 (12): 70–91. (in Chinese)
|
[15] |
Chen Y, Chen H, Li G, et al. Time-varying effect of macro-prudential policies on household credit growth: Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 2021, 72: 241–254. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2021.08.010
|
[16] |
Chari A, Stedman K D, Forbes K. Spillovers at the extremes: The macroprudential stance and vulnerability to the global financial cycle. Journal of International Economics, 2022, 136: 103582. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2022.103582
|
[17] |
Wang L, Li B, Ma X, et al. The price volatility spillover effect and its sustainability between Chinese crude oil future and international crude oil futures: Based on the BEKK-MGARCH model. Systems Engineering, 2021, 39(3): 102–120. (in Chinese)
|
[18] |
Zhou A, Han F. Research on the risk spillovers between stock and exchange rate markets—Based on the GARCH-TVP Copula-CoVaR model. Studies of International Finance, 2017 (11): 54–64. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16475/j.cnki.1006-1029.2017.11.006
|
[19] |
Bekiros S D, Paccagnini A. Macroprudential policy and forecasting using hybrid DSGE Models with financial frictions and state space Markov-switching TVP-VARs. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2014, 19 (7): 1565–1592. doi: 10.1017/S1365100513000953
|
[20] |
Alizadeh S, Brandt M W, Diebold F X. Range-based estimation of stochastic volatility models. Journal of Finance, 2002, 57(3): 1047–1091. doi: 10.1111/1540-6261.00454
|
[21] |
Livingston M, Poon W, Zhou L. Are Chinese credit ratings relevant? A study of the Chinese bond market and credit rating industry. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2018, 87 : 216–232. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.09.020
|
[22] |
Chesney M, Reshetar G, Karaman M. The impact of terrorism on financial markets: An empirical study. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2011, 35(2): 253–267. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.07.026
|
[23] |
Jiang X, Zhao Y. Research on the risks and opportunities faced by Chinese enterprises in issuing US dollar bonds. Economic Review Journal, 2017 (7): 112–117. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16528/j.cnki.22-1054/f.201707112
|
[24] |
Ferreira M A, Miguel A F. The determinants of domestic and foreign bond bias. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 2011, 21(5): 279–300. doi: 10.1016/j.mulfin.2011.07.004
|
[25] |
Zhou X, Li M, Liu T. Co-movements between onshore and offshore RMB bond markets. Studies of International Finance, 2015 (3): 44–53. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16475/j.cnki.1006-1029.2015.03.005
|