
A more than 3 m-long deployable boom is an essential component of the Mars Orbiter Magnetometer (MOMAG) onboard the orbiter of Tianwen-1. The boom was developed to place fluxgate magnetometer (FGM) sensors away from the satellite to reduce the influence of the satellite magnetic field. It was designed as an articulated spring-driven deployable mechanism for single-shot deployment. Functionality, reliability and system constraints are fully considered in the boom design. Mechanical analyses and proof tests show that the boom has sufficient safety margin to withstand environmental conditions, even in the worst cases. After a long voyage from Earth to Mars, the boom was deployed successfully on May 25, 2021. A full deployment was performed in about 4.6 s, sending the two sensors to distances of 3.19 m and 2.29 m respectively, away from the orbiter. After deployment, the field from the orbiter decreased from 1250 nT to less than 6 nT at the sensor mounted at the tip of the boom. The MOMAG boom provides valuable engineering experience for the development of deployable structures stowed for long periods in cold temperatures in space missions.
The deployable boom functioned normally and is consistent with the design expectations after long storage from Earth to Mars.
[1] |
Ouyang Z Y, Xiao F G. Major scientific issues involved in Mars exploration. Spacecraft Environment Engineering, 2011, 28 (3): 205–217. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1379.2011.03.001
|
[2] |
Li C L, Zhang R Q, Yu D Y, et al. China’s Mars exploration mission and science investigation. Space Science Reviews, 2021, 217: 57. DOI: 10.1007/S11214-021-00832-9
|
[3] |
Li C L, Liu J J, Geng Y, et al. Scientific objectives and payload configuration of China’s first mars exploration mission. Journal of Deep Space Exploration, 2018, 5 (5): 406–413. DOI: 10.15982/j.issn.2095-7777.2018.05.002
|
[4] |
Liu K, Hao X J, Li Y R, et al. Mars Orbiter Magnetometer of China’s first mars mission Tianwen-1. Earth Planet Physics, 2020, 4 (4): 384–389. DOI: 10.26464/epp2020058
|
[5] |
Michaelis H, Motschmann U, Roatsch T, et al. Magnetic fields near Mars: First results. Nature, 1989, 341: 604–607. DOI: 10.1038/341604a0
|
[6] |
Acuna M H, Connerney J E P, Wasilewski P, et al. Magnetic field and plasma observations at Mars: Initial results of the Mars Global Surveyor Mission. Science, 1998, 279 (5357): 1676–1680. DOI: 10.1126/science.279.5357.1676
|
[7] |
Acuna M H. Space-based magnetometers. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2002, 73 (11): 3717–3736. DOI: 10.1063/1.1510570
|
[8] |
Zhang T L, Baumjohann W, Delva M, et al. Magnetic field investigation of the Venus plasma environment: Expected new results from Venus Express. Planetary and Space Science, 2006, 54 (13-14): 1336–1343. DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2006.04.018
|
[9] |
Anderson B J, Acuna M H, Lohr D A, et al. The Magnetometer instrument on MESSENGER. Space Science Reviews, 2007, 131: 417–450. DOI: 10.1007/s11214-007-9246-7
|
[10] |
Connerney J E P, Espley J, Lawton P, et al. The MAVEN magnetic field investigation. Space Science Reviews, 2015, 195: 257–291. DOI: 10.1007/s11214-015-0169-4
|
[11] |
Connerney J E P, Benn M, Bjarno J B, et al. The Juno Magnetic Field investigation. Space Science Reviews, 2017, 213: 39–138. DOI: 10.1007/s11214-017-0334-z
|
[12] |
Ness N F, Behannon K W, Lepping R P, et al. Use of two magnetometers for magnetic field measurements on a spacecraft. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1971, 76 (16): 3564–3573. DOI: 10.1029/JA076i016p03564
|
[13] |
Neubauer F M. Optimization of multimagnetometer systems on a spacecraft. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1975, 80 (22): 3235–3240. DOI: 10.1029/JA080i022p03235
|
[14] |
Georgescu E, Auster H U, Takada T, et al. Modified gradiometer technique applied to Double Star (TC-1). Advances in Space Research, 2008, 41 (10): 1579–1584. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2008.01.014
|
Property | Requirement | Performance | Note |
Mass | ≤4 kg | 3.945 kg | |
Stowed length | ≤1.2 m | 1.11 m | |
Deployed length | ≥3 m | 3.19 m | |
Deployment time | ≤8 s | 4.3 s | Mean value of ground measurements |
Deployment angle | 135°±1° | 134.96° | Mean value of ground measurements |
Temperature range | −180 ℃ to +80 ℃ | −195 ℃ to +95 ℃ | Temperature of thermal cycling test |
Component | Stress tensor (maximum) | Safety margin | |
Requirement | Analytical result | ||
Root hinges | 132 MPa | >0 | 2.17 |
Elbow hinges | 42.7 MPa | >0 | 8.80 |
Boom limbs | 70.1 MPa | >0.25 | 11.07 |